两性色午夜

Biological Sciences Faculty Take on Invasive Plant Species of Ohio in New Book

Image
Book: Problem Plants of Ohio by Megan E. Griffiths-Ward, Melissa A. Davis, and David Ward
两性色午夜 University鈥檚 College of Arts and Sciences would like to congratulate three faculty members in the Department of Biological Sciences who recently co-authored a 384-page hardcover book, and available on Amazon.com.

Adjunct Professor Megan E. Griffiths-Ward, Ph.D., collaborated on the book with (her husband) Professor David Ward, Ph.D. and Melissa A. Davis, a botany instructor and the horticulture facilities director at 两性色午夜鈥檚 Herrick Conservatory and collections manager of the Tom S. and Miwako K. Cooperrider Herbarium at 两性色午夜.

An informative guide, the book provides information on the identification and control of nonnative plant species formally listed as invasive or prohibited noxious weeds in Ohio. In addition, the book treats many additional species that are considered a nuisance in gardens, landscaping, or natural settings.

Over the past two decades, Griffiths-Ward has studied plant-plant interactions with a focus on understanding the mechanisms by which disturbance and competition impact plant communities.

David Ward is the J. Arthur and Margaret Hatton Herrick Endowed Chair in Plant Conservation Biology at 两性色午夜. His research interests lie in the field of the ecology of plant species redistributions, including the study of both invasive and encroaching plant species, primarily trees. He also studies the effects of herbivory by large mammals (such as elephants) on the population biology, community ecology and conservation of plant populations. He teaches courses on plant ecology and invasion biology and co-leads (with Griffiths-Ward) student field courses in South Africa biennially.

The book includes more than 900 photographs of diagnostic features to aid in the identification of 148 plant species. The accompanying text details the origin of the species鈥 introduction to North America, provides thorough and accessible botanical descriptions, explains the economic and environmental impacts of each species, and includes basic information on control measures. The authors also include suggestions for native alternatives to use in gardens in place of problematic horticultural species.

Garlic Mustard and Other Common Problem Plants

Image
Garlic Mustard, photo credit to Chris Evans, University of Illinois, Bugwood.org
One of the most common problem plants in Ohio is Garlic Mustard (Alliaria petiolata), which forms dense stems in the forest understory, and it outcompetes native species.

鈥淲here it grows, pretty much nothing else can grow,鈥 Griffiths-Ward said. 鈥淭hat affects the herbaceous species, such as the little wildflowers, but it also affects tree seedlings. If the tree species in the forests can鈥檛 regenerate and can鈥檛 grow up from tree seedlings, then that becomes a long-term issue for forest health.鈥

Not many people or animals eat garlic mustard, and there are some native butterfly species that will lay their eggs on garlic mustard and then the caterpillar won鈥檛 survive.

鈥淭he costs are mostly ecological rather than economic with a species like garlic mustard,鈥 Griffiths-Ward said. 鈥淏ut it also does affect the forest, sort of the aesthetic of the forest, because if you have a dense stem of this weed it is not a very attractive place to be.鈥

鈥淚t鈥檚 also a species that some people we鈥檝e spoken to actually do like to eat,鈥 Ward said. 鈥淚t is edible, so it鈥檚 not a completely negative species, but the costs still far outweigh the benefits.鈥

Garlic mustard can be controlled by simply pulling it out. In the early Spring, many park systems and municipalities sponsor a 鈥榞arlic mustard pull鈥, where a large group of people go in and pull it out.

鈥淎s long as you get the whole tap root out, which does disturb the soil a bit, the plant is removed and it won鈥檛 grow back,鈥 Griffiths-Ward said. 鈥淵ou鈥檒l often have to do that many years over because there will be seeds that remain in the seedbank in the soil that will keep growing up for a while. But, for example, just on our own property over the last five years of being here, we鈥檝e pretty much eradicated it. So, it is effective. You just need to keep at it. You want to make sure that you are not leaving it out in a brush pile. You want to put it in a bag and send it to the dump so that you don鈥檛 have any seeds remaining.鈥

Other common problem plants in Ohio include Multiflora Rose (Rosa multiflora), Shrub Honeysuckles (Lonicera maackii, L. morrowii, L. tatarica, and Lonicera x bella), Asiatic Bittersweet (Celastrus orbiculatus) and Buckthorns (Frangula alnus and Rhamnus cathartica). To learn more about each of these species and how to eliminate them, visit New Book: Problem Plants of Ohio - 5 Most Common Invasive Plant Species in Ohio.

两性色午夜 the Book

The first book of this kind written specifically about Ohio, 鈥淧roblem Plants of Ohio鈥 also presents new research on the change in nonnative species over time and discusses how climate change will further exacerbate the issue of invasive species. It includes current distribution maps for each plant species. It is a useful resource for master gardeners, landscapers, farmers, academics, natural areas managers and nonspecialists.

鈥淲e really did try to write the book without too much fancy botanical terminology,鈥 Griffiths-Ward said. 鈥淚t鈥檚 there, but we鈥檝e really toned it down and tried to write the text in such a way that it can be accessible to your average homeowner. There are lots of keen gardeners out there. So, I think it really is going to be useful for them to identify and control invasive species and decide native plant alternatives to use instead.鈥

Many of the woody species covered in the book are plants that were brought in for horticulture and people planted them in gardens purposely and then they spread beyond that area of cultivation.

鈥淜nowing that it鈥檚 probably better not to plant yet another burning bush or yet another Japanese barberry is, I think, useful information for your average homeowner,鈥 Griffiths-Ward said. 鈥淲hen they鈥檙e presented with barberry and burning bush at the garden store, it鈥檚 useful to know what they could use in place of those.

鈥淲hile we (Megan and David) still lived in South Africa, a book titled 鈥楶roblem Plants and Alien Weeds of South Africa鈥 by Clive Bromilow (2010), crossed our desks, and we were inspired by its concise descriptions of plants, useful distribution maps, and carefully selected photographs that aided in identification,鈥 Griffiths-Ward continued. 鈥淲hen David was invited to join the Department of Biological Sciences at 两性色午夜 University, we searched for a similar resource to use as he established a new research program on a new continent. Only one book for the region existed, the incredibly important 鈥業nvasive Plants of the Upper Midwest鈥 by Elizabeth J. Czarapata (2005). That publication remains the foremost authority of invasive plants for the region, but it is not specific to Ohio and does not contain distribution maps, making it difficult to immediately differentiate the most problematic species in any given location. We believed the state deserved its own treatment of the many invasive plants and weeds found within its borders. Once on the ground in Ohio, we joined forces with Melissa Davis, whose local wisdom, classical botanical training, mapping skills, horticultural knowledge and herbicide expertise allowed us to produce the complete book.鈥

# # #

Media Contacts:
Jim Maxwell, jmaxwel2@kent.edu, 330-672-8028
David Ward, dward21@kent.edu, 330-672-9394

UPDATED: Friday, November 22, 2024 01:24 AM
WRITTEN BY:
Jim Maxwell